India’s ambitious ethanol blending programme, targeting 20% ethanol blending in gasoline by 2025, is a bold step towards enhancing energy security, addressing environmental concerns, and promoting rural development. However, this initiative operates within a complex socio-economic situation, presenting both substantial opportunities and significant challenges.
India’s approach to ethanol blending needs to be compared with global leaders like the United States, Brazil, the European Union, and China to understand the underlying opportunities. There is a need to analyse factors such as biofuel production, export restrictions, food security implications, energy security, economic impact, policy frameworks, technological advancements, and WTO regulations to come up with policy recommendations for a sustainable future.
READ | EV industry braces for fresh global challenges
Biofuel production: Opportunities and challenges
Globally, ethanol production is led by the United States and Brazil, leveraging abundant corn and sugarcane resources, respectively. The EU employs a diversified strategy with cereals, sugar beets, and advanced biofuels derived from waste biomass, while China utilises surplus crops like maize and cassava. India primarily relies on sugarcane molasses, a byproduct of sugar production, and surplus grains.
While leveraging these resources aligns with India’s agricultural strengths, challenges abound. Sugarcane is a water-intensive crop, raising concerns about water resource management in drought-prone regions. Additionally, molasses availability is tied to sugar production, creating vulnerability to market fluctuations. Recognising these constraints, India is exploring second-generation biofuels derived from non-food biomass and agricultural residues. However, scaling these technologies beyond pilot phases requires significant investment in distilleries, biorefineries, and robust supply chains.
Balancing domestic needs and global trade
Export restrictions on agricultural commodities reflect national priorities over international trade. The US and Brazil generally maintain open export policies, balancing domestic ethanol needs with global market commitments. Conversely, the EU and China impose selective restrictions to safeguard food and energy security during shortages.
India’s policy aligns with China’s approach, restricting exports of molasses and surplus grains during high domestic demand. While this ensures feedstock availability for ethanol production, it risks market distortions and scrutiny under WTO rules. Transparent export policies are essential to balance domestic priorities with international trade obligations, avoiding disputes and maintaining global credibility.
Food security and fuel demand
The food versus fuel debate is a critical issue in biofuel production. The US, with its large-scale corn-based ethanol industry, faces criticism for contributing to global food price volatility. Brazil’s sugarcane-based ethanol is more efficient and has less impact on staple food prices. The EU promotes second-generation biofuels to minimise food competition, while China focuses on surplus crops.
India must tread carefully, given its reliance on staple grains and its growing population. Diverting surplus grains and molasses for ethanol production could affect food availability and price stability. To mitigate these risks, India must adopt robust feedstock management, improve crop yields, and implement safety nets for vulnerable populations.
Reducing dependence on imported fuel
Ethanol blending enhances energy security by reducing reliance on imported oil. Brazil’s cost-efficient sugarcane-based ethanol programme and the EU’s integration of biofuels into renewable energy goals are successful models. Similarly, China prioritises ethanol blending for energy independence.
India’s EBP aims to cut crude oil imports, a significant contributor to its trade deficit. Achieving this requires expanding production capacity and developing an efficient nationwide fuel distribution network. Investments in pipelines, storage facilities, and blending stations are imperative for meaningful reductions in oil imports and enhanced energy security.
Rural development and job creation
Ethanol production has significant economic benefits, particularly for rural areas. The US and Brazil have created substantial rural employment in agriculture and processing, while the EU promotes innovation and job creation in advanced industries. China relies on subsidies and direct investments to sustain its sector and support rural employment.
In India, ethanol production offers stable markets for farmers’ surplus crops and generates rural jobs in distilleries and allied industries. However, the heavy reliance on government subsidies raises concerns about economic sustainability. To build a self-sufficient ethanol industry, India must focus on scaling production, reducing costs, and minimising subsidy dependence.
Policy frameworks and technology
Policy frameworks play a pivotal role in the success of ethanol blending programmes. The US employs the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), Brazil’s Proálcool programme integrates ethanol into its energy mix, and the EU’s Renewable Energy Directive (RED) sets stringent sustainability criteria. China’s state-led approach includes subsidies and mandates to support its ethanol industry.
Technological advancements are equally critical. The US and EU focus on second-generation biofuels like cellulosic ethanol, while Brazil has optimised sugarcane processing. India must invest in advanced technologies, such as lignocellulosic biomass processing, to enhance efficiency and sustainability.
Ensuring trade policy alignment
Biofuel trade policies are subject to WTO regulations. The US has faced challenges over subsidies, while Brazil’s efficient ethanol production complies with trade norms. The EU balances sustainability with compliance, and China’s policies are under scrutiny for subsidies and trade restrictions.
India’s export restrictions on ethanol feedstocks may face similar challenges. Ensuring alignment with WTO commitments, particularly the Agreement on Agriculture (AoA), is crucial to avoid disputes. Transparent and predictable trade policies will foster stability and credibility in global markets.
A sustainable roadmap for India
Drawing lessons from global leaders, India can strengthen its EBP through the following measures:
- Market stability and subsidy management (US): Implement flexible blending mandates and strategic reserves to reduce subsidy dependence.
- Technological efficiency (Brazil): Invest in advanced sugarcane processing and second-generation biofuels.
- Sustainability standards (EU): Adopt life-cycle assessments, certification schemes, and advanced biofuel research.
- Strategic government support (China): Leverage targeted subsidies, infrastructure investments, and clear blending mandates.
India’s EBP holds immense potential to transform its energy landscape. Diversifying feedstocks, adopting advanced technologies, promoting sustainable agricultural practices, and aligning trade policies with WTO norms are critical to achieving a balanced and sustainable ethanol blending programme. By learning from global best practices and tailoring them to local needs, India can lead the way in integrating biofuels into a sustainable energy future.
Dhriti Mukherjee Pipil is a research student at the Indian Institute of Foreign Trade, New Delhi.