A turning point for Japan’s economy: The surprise defeat of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party in the recent election has put Japan’s political stability and economic trajectory under the spotlight. Voters dealt a blow to Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba’s month-old administration, leaving the LDP-led coalition without a majority in the lower house for the first time in 15 years. This shift signals a turning point for the nation as it faces an uncertain future weighed down by economic stagnation, demographic challenges, and soaring national debt.
Japan, the world’s third-largest economy, has long been a powerhouse in advanced manufacturing and technology, boasting globally influential sectors in automotive, robotics, and electronics. Its export-driven economy and strong trade relationships have positioned it as a key player in the global supply chain, while a high standard of living and efficient infrastructure shows its economic maturity. Yet, despite these strengths, Tokyo now faces a confluence of challenges that threaten its growth and stability, as economic pressures converge with a shifting political landscape.”
READ | FDI norms: India seeks to reclaim global investment spotlight
Public rejection of scandal, stagnation
For decades, the LDP’s dominance in the country’s politics has been a pillar of continuity, ensuring political stability, alliance with the US, and an economic environment conducive to high living standards. However, this election has shattered that stability, reflecting public frustration over recent scandals and long-standing economic woes. Ties between the LDP and South Korea-based Unification Church, among other controversies, have eroded public trust, contributing to the recent electoral rebuke.
Beyond scandal, the LDP’s response to Japan’s growing socioeconomic issues has been perceived as insufficient. Economic growth has been nearly stagnant, with GDP growth declining and the yen hitting a historic low. An aging population continues to strain social welfare systems, creating an intergenerational divide over resources for elder care, defence, and economic innovation. The public’s priorities have shifted decisively toward pressing economic concerns, with employment, wage growth, and child care taking precedence over foreign policy.
Economic instability and debt burden
Japan’s economic trajectory is deeply troubled. The country’s debt-to-GDP ratio, already the highest among developed nations, has ballooned during the pandemic and now stands over 250%. The debt could increase even more rapidly if another significant economic shock occurs. The Bank of Japan’s strategy to raise interest rates, aimed at controlling inflation, threatens to exacerbate this debt burden, further limiting fiscal flexibility.
Fiscal consolidation is essential to address these mounting pressures. The LDP’s plan for a large supplementary budget, however, contradicts this need for economic restraint and could further delay necessary reforms. Without a strategic approach to fiscal sustainability, Japan risks undermining its economic future, as debt continues to siphon away resources crucial for addressing demographic and social challenges.
Aging and shrinking population
Japan’s aging society and shrinking workforce pose profound economic challenges. The country’s budget already allocates nearly one-third to social welfare expenses such as pensions and healthcare, expenses that will only increase as the population ages. Attempts to boost female workforce participation and re-employ seniors have yielded some benefits, but they are insufficient to offset the labour shortfall. Increasing immigration could address labour needs, yet political and cultural resistance make this solution highly contentious.
To adapt, Japan must foster long-term economic growth through innovation, particularly in science, technology, and education. However, a government in disarray and lacking the public’s confidence will struggle to inspire the corporate investments and political will necessary for a sustained economic transformation.
Coalition politics and a turn inward
Prime Minister Ishiba now faces the formidable task of forming a new coalition. Options are limited: alliances with the reformist Japan Innovation Party or the Democratic Party for the People (DPP) could give the LDP a slim majority, but these partners differ markedly on key policies. The Japan Innovation Party, for instance, advocates a more assertive foreign policy that may clash with the less hawkish Komeito, the LDP’s traditional partner.
This coalition building means the country’s foreign policy priorities will likely take a backseat, at least temporarily. Domestic concerns around Japan’s economy and social welfare are likely to dominate the policy agenda, in response to voter concerns. This shift inward could hinder Japan’s role in the Indo-Pacific, where a proactive stance is needed to address regional security challenges from China, North Korea, and Russia.
Japan has traditionally been the United States’ most reliable ally in Asia, sharing common interests in countering China’s military ambitions and maintaining a stable rules-based order in the region. The late Shinzo Abe’s tenure marked a high point in this alliance, as he strengthened Japan’s defence posture, revised military doctrine, and expanded partnerships with U.S. allies like South Korea and the Philippines.
Yet, this election outcome could signal a setback for these efforts. While the U.S.-Japan security alliance is unlikely to be immediately affected, a weakened or inward-looking Japan may be less capable of supporting joint military initiatives or rapid responses to regional threats. China’s measured response to the election suggests it may see an opportunity to deepen its influence in Asia, especially if Japan becomes less assertive under a fractured government.
Way ahead for Japan’s economy
Japan faces a daunting road ahead. To revitalise Japan’seconomy and navigate its demographic hurdles, the government must pursue comprehensive structural reforms. Encouragingly, there is broad consensus on the need for wage growth, improved employment prospects, and child care reforms, areas that could foster a more productive economy and attract greater workforce participation. However, these reforms require stable leadership, which will remain elusive unless the LDP can rebuild trust and refocus on transparency and accountability.
Additionally, Japan’s debt situation calls for a credible medium-term fiscal framework, as advocated by the IMF. This framework should prioritise the quality of public spending, ensuring funds go toward sustainable growth drivers, such as human resources and infrastructure. Failure to implement these measures may result in Japan’s debt spiralling out of control, undermining its capacity to respond to future crises.
Japan’s current political and economic turmoil is a wake-up call. The road to stability and growth demands both political courage and economic vision, qualities the LDP has struggled to demonstrate in recent years. While voters may have delivered a rebuke to the status quo, they also provide an opportunity for leaders to chart a new course—one that confronts the deep-seated issues plaguing Japan’s economy and strengthens its role in the global order.
In the coming months, Japan’s government will need to prove it can tackle these challenges head-on, restore public confidence, and inspire the bold reforms necessary for long-term prosperity. Whether it can rise to this challenge will determine not only Japan’s future but also the stability of the broader Indo-Pacific region.