Google is facing a barrage of lawsuits around the world concerning its business practices. In the US, the department of justice has sued Google over antitrust violations in search and advertising. Other US lawsuits allege privacy violations, copyright infringement, and unfair business practices. Recently, Google settled its fourth lawsuit in as many months, agreeing to erase data records of millions of users. This settlement, part of the Chasom Brown, et al. v. Google case, responded to accusations that Google misled users by tracking their online activity in the private Incognito mode of its Chrome browser.
Google has expended over $1 billion since December to resolve lawsuits targeting its search and advertising businesses. These settlements address various issues, including high fees for app developers, inappropriate sharing of user data from the now-defunct Google+ social media platform, and a patent dispute with Massachusetts-based Singular Computing.
READ | Kerala vs Centre: The state must balance welfare spending with fiscal prudence
Antitrust lawsuits on Google
These lawsuits challenging Google’s dominance raise critical questions about fair competition in the digital age. Critics argue that Google’s practices stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. For instance, app developers might be discouraged from entering the market if Google’s app store charges high fees or favours its own apps in search results. Additionally, Google’s control over the Android operating system, which powers a majority of smartphones, allows it to influence user behaviour and limit access to competing services.
The potential consequences of these practices extend beyond the tech industry. They can impact the overall health of the digital economy and limit consumer access to a wider range of products and services. Antitrust lawsuits play a crucial role in ensuring a level playing field and fostering a more competitive digital landscape.
In the Incognito mode lawsuit, Google agreed to revise its user disclosures to clarify that it collects private browsing data. This change was documented in a settlement filed with the US District Court for the Northern District of California, and it is now visible to users in India when they open Incognito mode.
Global scrutiny on data privacy
Big Tech companies are under increasing global scrutiny over data privacy concerns, leading to stricter regulations worldwide. A prime example is the European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), considered the most stringent privacy and security law globally. It imposes extensive requirements on organisations worldwide that process data related to EU citizens. The EU has enforced this regulation with significant fines, as seen with the $888 million penalty imposed on Amazon for GDPR violations and the ban on certain foreign social media firms.
The fragmented approach to data privacy in the US creates uncertainty for businesses and consumers alike. A patchwork of state laws makes it difficult for companies to comply with regulations and for users to understand their rights. The lack of a comprehensive federal law also leaves significant gaps in data protection, potentially exposing user information to misuse.
The passage of a national data privacy law in the US could address these concerns. Such a law could establish clear standards for data collection, use, and disclosure, giving users more control over their personal information. It could also require companies to implement stronger security measures to protect user data from breaches and unauthorised access. A national law would bring the US closer to the global consensus on data privacy and ensure a more secure digital environment for everyone.
The European Union has also hit Google with hefty antitrust fines, particularly regarding its dominance in search and the Android operating system. Additionally, EU lawsuits have addressed the Right to be Forgotten for individuals. In contrast, the United States has a more fragmented approach to data privacy, with various federal and state laws covering different aspects of data protection. However, most state laws do not regulate data collection comprehensively, allowing companies to use, sell, or share data without user consent. Some states, though, have enacted comprehensive data privacy laws, drawing parallels with the EU’s GDPR. Beyond the US and EU, Google has faced lawsuits in countries like India, Australia, and Brazil concerning data privacy, competition practices, and copyright issues.
Canada’s data protection framework involves a mix of federal and provincial laws governing the collection and use of personal information, with specific regulations for sectors like healthcare. Similarly, countries like Brazil, China, Australia, Singapore, and Thailand have enacted significant data privacy laws, each with unique provisions and enforcement mechanisms.
India’s draft Digital Personal Data Protection Bill is part of an effort to regulate the burgeoning digital economy and facilitate cross-border data flows, with exceptions for certain jurisdictions. It proposes hefty fines for data breaches but also grants extensive powers to the government, raising concerns about potential data misuse.
With the ubiquity of cloud services and frequent data breaches, the urgency for robust data protection laws is evident. According to UNCTAD, 137 out of 194 countries have enacted data protection and privacy legislation, highlighting the global consensus on the importance of safeguarding personal information. As the value of personal data for targeted advertising and profiling increases, it is vital for countries to enhance their data protection laws and empower individuals to control their data. This effort should include raising awareness about the importance of privacy and considering technological advancements that may render current laws obsolete. Strengthening and future-proofing data protection legislation is essential to address these evolving challenges.