“President Trump is the global media’s newest junk food,” a friend remarked, capturing with brutal precision the unrelenting media frenzy that Donald Trump incites. Like junk food, his second-term presidency could serve up an irresistible, high-calorie diet of controversy, drama, and theatrics—addictive and flavourful, yet persistently questioned for its nourishment.
Trump generates an unprecedented volume of content daily. The more outlandish his statements, the more outrageous his actions, the louder the headlines grow. Whether silly, exaggerated, or alarming, his every move is devoured with equal ferocity. The modern media, perpetually hungry for sensationalism and increasingly competing with social media, thrives on Trump’s theatrics. But therein lies the paradox: this relentless cycle of shock and awe may feed public curiosity but starves public discourse of depth and balance.
READ | DeepSeek as Sputnik moment: Is the US losing its technological edge?
Trump presidency marked by urgency and disruption
Donald Trump’s presidency represents a seismic shift in global politics, marked by his audacious determination to dismantle orthodoxies and upend the established order. With age not on his side, he has embarked on his second term with an urgency that is impossible to ignore. His America First agenda seeks to redefine globalisation by prioritising narrow national interests over multilateral cooperation, often at the expense of long-standing allies and global norms. By questioning the utility of military alliances like NATO, withdrawing from international agreements, and initiating trade wars, he has injected a level of unpredictability into global affairs that has shaken the status quo.
This urgency stems not only from Trump’s ambitions but also from his awareness of the constraints imposed by time. At 78, he knows he must achieve in a few short years what many of his younger predecessors could spread across decades of post-presidency influence. For Trump, time is not just finite—it is a catalyst for bold, often impulsive actions aimed at securing a legacy that outshines his predecessors and contemporaries alike.
His every move reflects the recognition that the window to cement his imprint on history is rapidly closing. The job ahead is a test of endurance, where the weight of the world bears down on one man, demanding both a clear mind and an unwavering spirit to lead through constant turmoil.
Trump: Calculated disruptor or a reckless leader
As Brahma Chellaney observed in his recent op-ed in Open Magazine, Trump’s actions are not merely reactive but part of a calculated effort to craft a powerful legacy before his time is up. His willingness to defy Washington’s political orthodoxy reflects a broader ambition to reshape both domestic and international power dynamics. This relentless drive to challenge convention, while deeply divisive, demands serious analysis—not only for its disruptive nature but also for the potential long-term consequences on global stability and the frameworks that underpin international cooperation. Whether Trump’s legacy endures as reformative or destabilising remains a critical question in this era of uncertainty.
The seriousness of his presidency cannot be underestimated. In his quest to redefine America’s role in the world, Trump has laid bare the vulnerabilities of long-standing global institutions, exposed the fragility of multilateralism, and fundamentally altered the way diplomacy is conducted. Whether one admires or abhors his approach, the reality is that Trump has forced the world to confront uncomfortable questions about the effectiveness of the existing order. His presidency is no mere spectacle—it is a deliberate, if chaotic, attempt to remake the rules of engagement in politics, economics, and diplomacy.
Trump and Musk: A partnership of spectacle
Trump has also found an unlikely ally in Elon Musk, whom he might see as his “younger me” with actual money—more money, at that. Musk’s purchase of Twitter, now rebranded as X, almost feels like an “invest-in-a-friend” offering tailor-made for Trump. The platform, once a bastion of public debate, now serves as a louder, less filtered megaphone for Trumpian theatrics. Musk’s laissez-faire approach to moderation has effectively created a digital stage where Trump’s brand of provocations can thrive unchecked, amplifying the very cycles of sensationalism and spectacle that keep both men firmly in the public eye.
The transformation of X into a stage for unmoderated provocations mirrors a deeper shift in the digital ecosystem, where engagement triumphs over accountability, and polarisation fuels profitability. In Trump and Musk, this new frontier finds its quintessential champions.
Media’s role: Amplifier or gatekeeper
The challenge, however, extends beyond Trump himself. It lies in the media’s insatiable appetite for controversy and its complicity in amplifying noise over substance. The wilder the spectacle, the more intense the coverage. He provides the content, but it is the media that packages it into a product consumed globally, with little regard for its nutritional value. This symbiotic relationship ensures that the focus remains on the trivial rather than the transformative.
The consequences of this dynamic are far-reaching. The constant barrage of sensationalism distracts from critical global issues requiring thoughtful attention. Policy debates are overshadowed by personality politics. The complexity of governance is reduced to the simplicity of a soundbite. And in the process, citizens are left with a distorted understanding of reality—fed, but not nourished.
Ultimately, the Trump phenomenon—both his presidency and its media narrative—forces us to confront an uncomfortable truth: modern leadership is no longer judged by its ability to build but by its skill in disrupting. Whether this recalibration of power serves the public good remains the question of our time.
As the world braces itself for four more years of Trump-driven headlines, the media must reflect on its role in this cycle. Will it continue to gorge on the junk food he serves, or will it rise to the challenge of offering a more balanced and thoughtful menu? The answer will not only define Trump’s legacy but also shape the future of journalism in a hyper-polarised world.