Why is the United States government suddenly insisting that only two genders exist? What happens to countless individuals who don’t fit into this rigid, outdated binary? Is this an attack on human rights, or just another political move?
With President Donald Trump’s executive order, we are forced to confront uncomfortable questions about identity, equality, and what it means to truly respect human dignity. Is this the beginning of the end for gender inclusivity in America, or will society rise above this backward move?
READ | Hydrocarbon revival: Trump’s policies will reshape global energy game
A major policy shift
On the first day of his second term, President Trump issued an executive order mandating that the United States government recognise only two sexes—male and female—based on biological assignment at birth. This directive reverses years of progress toward recognising gender diversity and the rights of transgender and non-binary individuals.
While this decision is undoubtedly a blow to transgender and non-binary individuals, its implications extend beyond personal identity. This policy presents significant challenges for businesses that have embraced sex inclusivity, leaving them at a crossroads: will they stand for human dignity or bow to political pressure?
The policy sends a chilling message to transgender and non-binary individuals: their identities are invalid in the eyes of their own government. This institutional denial risks intensifying social stigma, alienation, and discrimination. For individuals whose identities have long been marginalised, this is more than a legal setback—it is an emotional and psychological blow.
Legacy of gender binary framework
Historically, sex has been understood as binary—male and female—based on biological characteristics at birth. This perspective, deeply ingrained in societal norms, laws, and cultural narratives, shaped roles and expectations, often at the expense of individuality.
However, in recent years, younger generations have challenged these boundaries, embracing the idea that gender exists on a spectrum. Gender fluidity, non-binary identities, and the distinction between biological sex and gender identity are gaining wider recognition. This shift reflects a broader understanding of human identity: it is personal, nuanced, and cannot always be confined to traditional labels.
Practical arguments vs individual rights
Some argue that the binary framework simplifies legal and administrative processes, particularly in healthcare, sports, and documentation. While this may seem practical, it undermines the complexities of identity and the individual’s right to self-identify. Reducing gender to a rigid binary perpetuates outdated norms, marginalising a significant portion of the population.
This policy puts progressive businesses in a difficult position. For years, corporations have been leaders in embracing inclusivity—offering gender-neutral restrooms, providing health benefits for gender-affirming care, and adopting inclusive workplace policies. With federal policy now contradicting these efforts, businesses must decide whether to uphold their inclusive values or comply with exclusionary directives.
The legal ramifications for businesses are equally complex. Companies that continue to support gender inclusivity may face challenges, from potential lawsuits to navigating contradictory state and federal laws. These decisions will have far-reaching consequences for workplace diversity and corporate social responsibility.
Global ripple effect
The implications of this policy are not confined to the U.S. If America enforces rigid gender definitions, it risks influencing other nations, particularly those with conservative political climates. Countries on the brink of recognising gender inclusivity might retreat, further entrenching binary norms.
It is crucial for the global community to stand firm in support of inclusivity, ensuring that human rights remain central to international discourse.
Importance of recognising identity
At its core, identity is a deeply personal journey of self-discovery. Whether one identifies as male, female, non-binary, or another identity, it is valid and deserving of respect. This generational shift toward embracing fluidity signifies progress, not a rejection of tradition but an expansion of it.
Inclusivity is about understanding and accepting diversity. Respecting individual choice is the cornerstone of a fair and just society.
As philosopher Maya Angelou once said, “We all should know that diversity makes for a rich tapestry, and we must understand that all the threads of the tapestry are equal in value no matter their colour.”
The fight for gender inclusivity is far from over. Businesses and individuals must grapple with the consequences of this executive order and decide where they stand. Will the spirit of progress prevail, or will society regress to rigid definitions and exclusions?
Only time will tell, but one thing remains clear: the freedom to choose one’s identity is fundamental to human dignity. The world must continue to advocate for policies that uphold the rights of all individuals, regardless of gender identity.
Srinath Sridharan is a strategic counsel with 25 years experience with leading corporates across diverse sectors including automobiles, e-commerce, advertising and financial services. He understands and ideates on intersection of finance, digital, contextual-finance, consumer, mobility, Urban transformation, and ESG. Actively engaged across growth policy conversations and public policy issues.